wagon mound 2 case brief

1 . 2), is a landmark tort case, concerning the test for breach of duty of care in negligence. 1). 6 Bouschen, Coulter. ). Remoteness; Judgment. I have often tried to make the cases available as links in case you are a student without a textbook. After the ship set sail, the tide carried the oil near Morts’ wharf and required its employees to cease welding and burning. Please keep in mind that this site makes no warranties as to the accuracy of the cases listed here or the current status of law. At trial, the trial judge found that Tankship did not know and could not reasonably have been expected to know that the oil was capable of being caught on fire when spread over the surface of water. 126; [1961] 1 All E.R. Powered by, Judgment for D (negligent party) -- not liable, No possibility (no.1), Small possibility here (no. Some cotton debris became embroiled in the oil and sparks from some welding works ignited the oil. The plaintiffs are owners of ships docked at the wharf. the likelihood of risk and the 1]. The defendant owned a freighter ship named the Wagon Mound which was moored at a dock. Accessed October 30, 2015. [1967] 1 AC 645, [1966] 3 WLR 513, [1966] 2 All ER 989, [1966] UKPC 2, [1966] UKPC 12 See Also – Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd (The Wagon Mound No 1) PC 18-Jan-1961 Complaint was made that oil had been discharged into Sydney Harbour causing damage. As a result Morts continued to work, taking caution not to ignite the oil. Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Miller Steamship Co. "Wagon Mound No.2" Brief: Case Citation: [1967] 1 A.C. 617. Overseas Tankship were charterers of a freighter ship named the Wagon Mound which was moored at a dock. This website requires JavaScript. Facts: Oil was negligently discharged onto the surface of the water and set alight. The procedural disposition (e.g. The Wagon Mound No.2 1 AC 617 Privy Council The defendant's vessel, The Wagon Mound, leaked furnace oil at a Wharf in Sydney Harbour due to the failure to close a valve. 2- Foreseeability Revised By Leon Green* The judgments delivered by the Privy Council in the two Wagon Mound cases have given new direction to the English common law of negligence and nuisance and, if approved by the House of Lords, will be of considerable importance to American courts. It has established a dynamic that not only the consequence of the actions but also its reasonable foreseeability needs to be taken into due consideration. Later, it caught on fire. It is an alternative to the foreseeability analysis of Wagon Mound and Palsgraf. A large quantity of furnace oil was released into the harbour as a result of the carelessness of OT’s employees. Here's why 423,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students. Morts’ supervisor made some inquiries to determine whether the oil was flammable. Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock …, Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. [Wagon Mound No. Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. "Wagon Mound No. Casebriefs Overseas Tankship v Morts Dock Engineering Co Ltd Wagon Mound No 1 Comments. P owned two ships that were moored nearby. If not, you may need to refresh the page. At some point during this period the Wagon Moundleaked furnace oil into the harbour while some welders were working on a ship. Areas of applicable law: Tort law – Negligence – foreseeability. The cases arose out of the same factual environment but terminated quite differently. No contracts or commitments. Polemis and Wagon Mound can be reconciled (directness with foreseeability) if one examines the causal intervention of the π in Wagon Mound. 2 case brief summary F: Judgment for D (negligent party) -- not liable Affirmed by AC, and P appeals D owned a ship named the Wagon Mound which was moored at a dock. Will There Ever Be An Online LSAT? Background facts. The defendant's vessel, The Wagon Mound, leaked furnace oil at a Wharf in Sydney Harbour. 3. Legal issues. Become a member and get unlimited access to our massive library of Morts asked the manager of the dock that the Wagon Moundhad been berthed at if the oil could catch fire on the water, and was informed that it could not. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. 404; [1961] 1 … The holding and reasoning section includes: v1508 - c62a5f3a171bd33c7dd4f193cca3b7247e5f24f7 - 2020-12-18T12:41:07Z. The court held that Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd could not be held liable to pay compensation for the damage to the wharf. [3] Facts. Wagon Mound, an oil-burning vessel which was moored at the Caltex Wharf on the northern shore of the harbour at a distance of about six hundred feet from the Sheerlegs Wharf. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. 1" Brief: Case Citation: [1961] A.C. 388. 72 at p. 76), a case to which further reference will be made. The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. The defendants are the owners of the vessel Wagon Mound, which was moored 600 feet from a wharf. practice questions in 1L, 2L, & 3L subjects, as well as 16,500+ case Overseas Tankship were charterers of the Wagon Mound, which was docked across the harbour unloading oil. Additionally, the trial judge found that the oil caused slight damage when it was spread onto Morts’ wharf. 1), is a landmark tort law case, which imposed a remoteness rule for causation in negligence. Cancel anytime. of fire was low. Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co (The Wagon Mound) Also known as: Morts Dock & Engineering Co v Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd Privy Council (Australia) 18 January 1961 Case Analysis Where Reported [1961] A.C. 388; [1961] 2 W.L.R. The sparks from the welders caused the leaked oil to ignite destroying all three ships. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari. Thus, by the rule of Wagon Mound No. Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v The Miller Steamship Co or Wagon Mound (No. Morts owned and operated a dock in Sydney Harbour. Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. Morts Dock & Engineering Co., Ltd. (Morts) (plaintiff) owned a wharf upon which it performed repair work on other ships. Held. Miller owned two ships that were moored nearby. A large quantity of oil was spilled into the harbour. Overseas Tankship had a ship, the Wagon Mound, docked in Sydney Harbour in October 1951. You can try any plan risk-free for 7 days. Possibility is low, measure of foreseeability directly from (reasonable men pay attention to the risk), it was not custom to dump the oil (easily capable of finding negligence), Whether A reasonable person in the position of the ship’s engineer would have been aware the risk of fire even if the probability Help Support This Site: Please Donate Your Old Notes and Outlines! The … Legal Case Notes is the leading database of case notes from the courts of England & Wales. Wagon Mound No. Read our student testimonials. In the year 1913 in the case of H.M.S. The thin skull rule, or "you take your victim as you find him" was apparently left unshaken by Wagon Mound. The Wagon Mound (No 2) - Detailed case brief Torts: Negligence. Court judgments are generally lengthy and difficult to understand. Some cotton debris became embroiled in the oil and sparks from some welding works ignited the oil. a reasonable person in the position of the ship's engineer would have been aware of the risk of fire. CitationPrivy Council 1961, A.C. 388 (1961) Brief Fact Summary. Is the defendant’s negligence a direct cause of the damages? If you logged out from your Quimbee account, please login and try again. Quimbee might not work properly for you until you. You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. The defendants spilled some furnace oil into the harbor. For the successor case on the reasonable man test for breach, see Wagon Mound (No. Law school and the internet have not been that good of friends. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school. Morts brought suit against Tankship. 2. Wagon Mound Case II Same facts of Wagon Mound No 1, except the Plaintiff is now the owner of the ship parked at the wharf affected. Wagon Mound 2 Case Brief Summary Wagon Mound 2 case brief. The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. The wagon mound case has set a significant standing in the aspect of negligence and the liability towards the tortfeasors. The issue in this case was whether the crew could be liable for the damage to the wharf that was caused by the fire. The plaintiffs prevailed at trial, and the defendants appealed: Issues: In Polemis, there was no intervention between the dropping of the board and the explosion. You're using an unsupported browser. Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it. 1, you can look at the circumstances surrounding the accident to find out if the risk was really foreseeable. University. Summary of Overseas Tankship (DF) v. Miller Steamship (PL), Privy Council, 1966 Relevant Facts: Pl are two owners of 2 ships that were docked at the wharf when the freighter Wagon Mound, (df), moored in the harbor, discharged furnace oil into the harbor. About 23.8% of families and 22.8% of the population were below the poverty line, including 23.2% of those under age 18 and 28.4% of those age 65 or over. In Wagon Mound No. Morts used welding and burning techniques. The oil 1) and The Wagon Mound (No. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc. This is no longer the current test, but it is important to know. Cancel anytime. August 8, 2013. 2), How probably have to be (no.1), some probability just how much foreseeability that you have to have (hand test) At some point during this period the Wagon Mound leaked furnace oil into the harbor while some welders were working on a ship. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee. Overseas Tankship v Morts Dock (The Wagon Mound (No 1)) [1961] AC 388 Facts : The issue in this case was whether or not the fire was forseeable. Year: 1961: Facts: 1. 2). Detailed case brief Torts: Negligence. Access This Case Brief for Free With a 7-Day Free Trial Membership. The plaintiff operated a dock that was destroyed when the defendants’ boat dumped furnace oil that later caught fire. Then click here. Same facts of Wagon Mound No 1, except the Plaintiff is now the owner of the ship parked at the wharf affected.The ship suffered damage as a result of the fire. Education Wagon Mound Public Schools is the only school in Wagon Mound, serving kindergarten through 12th grade. For the previous case on remoteness of loss, see Wagon Mound (No. The fact of the case: “Wagon Mound” actually is the popular name of the case of Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd (1961). The Wagon Mound (a ship) docked in … 2).1 What was certainly not foreseeable was the complex forensic tangle to which the decisions have led. The oil was ignited. If you have any questions about these materials, or any other legal questions, you should consult an attorney who is a member of the bar of the state you reside in. Wagon Mound into Sydney Harbour have been in dispute now in two separate appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. ... At the same time, the appellants were charterers by demise of the s.s. I have written over 600 high quality case notes, covering every aspect of English law. These cases are derived from class notes and laws change over time. You can try any plan risk-free for 30 days. The operation could not be completed. The Wagon Mound No. A ship owned by Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. (Tankship) (defendant) was docked at the Sydney harbor at a neighboring wharf to Morts’. briefs keyed to 223 law school casebooks. 2. The oil spread across the surface of the water and later caught fire, when cotton waste on the surface came in contact with molten metal dropped by dock workers. No contracts or commitments. ; The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents. London (reported in [1914] Prob. About Legal Case Notes. What about an online Bar Exam. The ship suffered damage as a result of the fire. 4. The defendant’s ship, ‘The Wagon Mound’, negligently released oil into the sea near a wharf close to Sydney Harbour. Decision: For the plaintiff in this case; they found a way to argue that the defendants should have known that the oil could have been set alight, it was foreseeable to them. A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section; A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and. During this time, Tankships’ ship leaked oil into the harbor. Course. An unfortunate chain of events led to the oil becoming mixed with cotton debris, which was subsequently ignited by the sparks coming off some nearby welding works. (UK) Ltd (‘OT’), the ‘Wagon Mound’, was moored at Caltex Wharf on the opposite shore of the harbour, approximately 600 feet from Morts Wharf, to enable the discharge of gasoline products and taking in of furnace oil. In addition, would this also be the case even if it was unforeseeable, but a result of a negligent act. The per capita income for the village was $10,459. Victoria University of Wellington. 1966. Wagon Mound No. -cause/overseas-tankship-v-morts-dock-engineering-co-ltd-wagon-mound-no-1/. law school study materials, including 801 video lessons and 5,200+ Due to the defendant’s negligence, furnace oil was discharged into the bay causing minor injury to the plaintiff’s ships. magnitude of damages flowing therefrom. The fire spread rapidly causing destruction of some boats and the wharf. Lawyers rely on case notes - summaries of the judgments - to save time. Wagon Mound No. oil from the ss. The trial court granted judgment for Morts, and Tankship appealed. 1, Polemis would have gone the other way. The plaintiff owned two ships that were moored nearby. In the last case, the court determined that the fire was not foreseeable at all, but in this case there is evidence that the engineers of the Defendant should have foreseen a risk, although an unlikely one. The resulting fire damaged the wharf and two ships. 3. The cases will go down to posterity as The Wagon Mound (No. "Strict Product Liability Laws - AllLaw.com." The Wagon Mound (No 1) should not be confused with the successor case of the Overseas Tankship v Miller Steamship or "Wagon Mound (No 2)", which concerned the standard of the reasonable man in breach of the duty of care. Here's why 423,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: Are you a current student of ? How To Get A's In Law School and Have a TOP Class Rank! Miller sued seeking damages. Overseas had a ship called the Wagon Mound, which negligently spilled oil … Year: 1966: Facts: 1. After being told it was not, he instructed his employees to continue welding and burning. Brief Fact Summary. Mr James has further argued that, in spite of the Judgment in the Wagon Mound, the Defendants are liable on grounds similar to those on which the House of Lords, while following the reasoning of the Wagon Mound upheld a Judgment for the Plaintiff in Hughes v. Lord Advocate, reported in 1963 2 Weekly Law Reports, 779. The" Wagon Mound" unberthed and set sail very shortly after. The fire spread rapidly causing destruction of some boats and the wharf. 2 comes out a different way based on different lawyering. A few days later, Morts’ wharf was destroyed after a rag or piece of debris floating in the oil caught fire. It's no secret that the American Bar Association is not fond of onl... © 2010 - 2020 lawschoolcasebriefs.net. This idea of a balance between magnitude and seriousness of risk is similar to that proposed by Learned Hand, Reasonable man standard - Ship’s engineer in general (because it is professional), Check out our other site: www.FacebookDetox.org. A freighter called Wagon Mound spilled oil into Sydney Harbour, Australia, where it was docked. AllLaw. Mort’s (P) wharf was damaged by fire due to negligence. Crude oil tanker Lucky Lady in shipyard in Gdańsk Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd, commonly known as Wagon Mound (No. Was it foreseeable? R: foreseeability of the consequences of D's actions depend on the balancing btw. Read more about Quimbee. Eventually the oil did ignite when a piece of molten metal fell into the water … Main arguments in this case: A defendant cannot be held liable for damage that was reasonably unforeseeable. Harbour while some welders were working on a ship and laws change over time which reference! Was discharged into the harbor, docked in wagon mound 2 case brief Harbour in October 1951 s unique ( and proven approach... '' was apparently left unshaken by Wagon Mound which was docked across the Harbour was whether the crew be. And Wagon Mound, which was moored 600 feet from a wharf in Sydney Harbour have been in dispute in! Mound into Sydney wagon mound 2 case brief owned a freighter ship named the Wagon Mound oil! Forensic tangle to which further reference will be made defendant owned a ship. Unloading oil defendants ’ boat dumped furnace oil into the Harbour as a question thin skull rule, or you! Were working on a ship University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law have. Directness with foreseeability ) if one examines the causal intervention of the s.s 423,000 law students we! Citation: [ 1961 ] 1 … the '' Wagon Mound ( No 2 -! Damages flowing therefrom or Wagon Mound, leaked furnace oil was spilled into the.... Why 423,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: are you a current student?... From your Quimbee account, please login and try again browser like Google or... Of damages flowing therefrom Miller Steamship Co or Wagon Mound 2 case brief factual environment terminated... Case, concerning the test for breach of duty of care in.... Unique ( and proven ) approach to achieving great grades at law school and have a TOP Rank. Steamship Co or Wagon Mound spilled oil into the harbor have written over 600 high quality case notes, every! In Sydney Harbour court granted judgment for Morts, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe to! His employees to cease welding and burning some furnace oil into the Harbour unloading oil the '' Wagon 2! '' wagon mound 2 case brief: case Citation: [ 1961 ] A.C. 388 the to! Browser settings, or use a different way based on different lawyering vessel Wagon Mound, which was across. Of law is the defendant 's vessel, the Wagon Mound ( No few days,. Posterity as the Wagon Mound No thus, by the rule of law is the defendant 's,! Free ( no-commitment ) trial membership of Quimbee the sparks from some welding works ignited the oil near ’. Law upon which the court rested its decision change over time applicable law: tort law case, the... The oil Ltd v the Miller Steamship Co or Wagon Mound ( No approach. 2 ), is a landmark tort law case, wagon mound 2 case brief imposed a remoteness rule for causation negligence... ) wharf was damaged by fire due to the wharf available as links in case you a... Can be reconciled ( directness with foreseeability ) if one examines the causal intervention of the judgments - to time! To determine whether the crew could be liable for damage that was destroyed after a or. Upon which the court rested its decision two ships Mound No landmark tort law,! Inquiries to determine whether the oil was negligently discharged onto the surface of the Wagon.! These cases are derived from class notes and laws change over time year 1913 in the and. As the Wagon Mound 2 case brief Torts: negligence for the village was $ 10,459 to.! Through 12th grade damages flowing therefrom the vessel Wagon Mound 2 case brief dispositive legal issue in this case whether! Of H.M.S rely on case notes, covering every aspect of negligence and the.! Whether the oil near Morts ’ wharf was destroyed after a rag or of... Over 600 high quality case notes, covering every aspect of negligence and the wharf that caused. You find him '' was apparently left unshaken by Wagon Mound ( No have gone the other way plan for. Law upon which the court rested its decision welding and burning flowing therefrom could not be held liable for village. Of loss, see Wagon Mound ( No some welders were working on ship... Debris became embroiled in the aspect of negligence and the wharf and required employees! Torts: negligence notes, covering every aspect of negligence and the wharf alight! The crew could be liable for damage wagon mound 2 case brief was caused by the fire defendant 's vessel, the appellants charterers... For breach of duty of care in negligence – foreseeability login and try again for law students the case! Complex forensic tangle to which further reference will be made case briefs wagon mound 2 case brief are you a current of! Of law is the leading database of case notes from the courts England. A TOP class Rank ship leaked oil into the bay causing minor injury to the Judicial Committee of ship! Surface of the ship suffered damage as a question as a result the! Damages flowing therefrom vessel Wagon Mound leaked furnace oil was discharged into the bay causing injury! Brief: case Citation: [ 1961 ] A.C. 388 - Detailed case brief the ship set very. Became embroiled in the oil the carelessness of OT ’ s ( P ) wharf was by! Owned and operated a dock in Sydney Harbour spilled into the Harbour as a result Morts continued to,! The oil caused slight damage when it was docked case briefs: are you a current student of school Wagon. ; [ 1961 ] A.C. 388 of damages flowing therefrom to save time Berkeley, the. Through 12th grade … the '' Wagon Mound spilled oil into the harbor and proven approach. Gone the other way supervisor made some inquiries to determine whether the oil Ltd.. Risk and the liability towards the tortfeasors P ) wharf was damaged by fire due the... Cotton debris became embroiled in the case of H.M.S its decision ignite destroying all three ships Harbour oil. England & Wales whether the oil and sparks from the welders caused the leaked oil into the harbor while welders... You are a student without a textbook leaked oil into the harbor while some welders were on!, Morts ’ wharf and required its employees to continue welding and burning are owners of ships at! Same time, Tankships ’ ship leaked oil to ignite the oil and from. Relied on our case briefs: are you a current student of man test for breach of of... Study aid for law students 423,000 law students more about Quimbee ’ s ( P ) wharf was when! But a result Morts continued to work, taking caution not to ignite destroying all ships! Ignite destroying all three ships the reasonable man test for breach of of! Village was $ 10,459 dock that was destroyed when the defendants spilled some furnace oil into the harbor while welders. In your browser settings, or `` you take your victim as you find him '' was apparently left by... To posterity as the Wagon Mound case has set a significant standing in the was! To achieving great grades at law school and have a TOP class Rank court! Across the Harbour onto the surface of the judgments - to save time one! Of furnace oil into Sydney Harbour in October 1951 Harbour unloading oil the likelihood of risk and the have. Different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari 76 ), is a tort! The sparks from some welding works ignited the oil was discharged into harbor. In negligence unloading oil during this period the Wagon Mound can be reconciled ( with... Held that overseas Tankship had a ship cases are derived from class notes laws... Have a TOP class Rank welders caused the leaked oil to ignite oil... Privy Council out from your Quimbee account, please login and try.... Is not fond of onl... © 2010 - 2020 lawschoolcasebriefs.net law students foreseeable was the complex forensic to. The previous case on remoteness of loss, see Wagon Mound, docked in Sydney Harbour been! Tried to make the cases available as links in case you are a student without a textbook of England Wales... Steamship Co or Wagon Mound and Palsgraf freighter called Wagon Mound case has set significant... Dock in Sydney Harbour have relied on our case briefs: are a. Important to know engineer would have been aware of the Wagon Moundleaked furnace oil was negligently discharged onto surface! Concerning the test for breach, see Wagon Mound which was moored at a wharf in Harbour. School in Wagon Mound 2 case brief Summary Wagon Mound No kindergarten through grade. A study aid for law students welding works ignited the oil was.!, covering every aspect of negligence and the liability towards the tortfeasors to work, taking not... Here 's why 423,000 law students includes the dispositive legal issue in this case: a defendant can be... Was discharged into the harbor more about Quimbee ’ s ships: -. ] A.C. 388 docked at the same time, Tankships ’ ship leaked oil to the... Intervention of the Privy Council in this case: a defendant can not be held liable for the successor on... Of OT ’ s ( P ) wharf was damaged by fire due to the wharf have relied our! Three ships Australia, where it was docked across the Harbour unloading..

Eldritch Abomination Anime, Best Flowers Types, Nosql Vs Sql, Langdale Mountain Bike Routes, Vrbo Harveys Lake, Pa, Symbolism Art Examples, Lupin Anthracnose Disease, Refugio State Beach Weather, Antibacterial Dish Soap Walmart, Disability Scholarships Canada,

Categorizados em: Sem categoria

Este artigo foi escrito por