doctrine of comparative negligence philippines

“Error” and “Wrong” do not mean the same thing. Contributory negligence doctrine. If someone be damaged, he does not necessarily have right to be indemnified. Alvin Claridades, author of lawbooks @ Central Book Supply. For example, if a plaintiff's total damages are $100,000, and the plaintiff is 25% at fault, the plaintiff can recover $75,000 of the damages and will be responsible for … This is why, particularly in criminal cases, courts are given greater leeway or discretion in imposing the proper penalty, and are not bound to mathematical formulas to the lowering of degrees of penalty. Mixed Comparative and Contributory Negligence, Some states follow a mixture of comparative and contributory negligence, whereby a plaintiff who is less than fifty percent at fault may recover damages reduced by the plaintiff's proportion of fault, but a plaintiff who is more than fifty percent at fault may not recover damages, or may recover only a percentage of economic damages, against the defendants. I am Jane wembli used every single spell worker on the internet, spent untold amounts of money and discovered they are all fakes...i was the fool though; doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. ), Sub-topic: Indemnification of Willfull or Negligent Acts. We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. Typically, this applies in an employment context, where the employer (master) is responsible for the negligent acts of the employee (servant) which occur within the context of the employment relationship. A typical formula for evaluating negligence requires that a plaintiff prove the following four factors by a "preponderance of the evidence": The defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff (or a duty to the general public, including the plaintiff); As a result of the defendant's violation of that duty, the plaintiff suffered injury; and. Acts resulting from negligence may vary in nature, extent, and resulting consequences. The contributory negligence doctrine is only followed by four states and the District of Columbia. When Judiciary can interfere in decisions of Religious Tribunals. The doctrine that allows a recovery by a plaintiff whose own act contributed to his injury, provided his negligence was slight as compared with that of the defendant. It held that the crime of rebellion under This doctrine, followed in states such as Alaska and California, allows a plaintiff to recover damages from the defendant minus his or her percentage of responsibility. The principle that once a court has Review Outline in Civil Procedure by Prof. Alvin Claridades with Foreword fro... Guidebook on Legal Research and Thesis Writing by Atty. State laws determine which of these doctrines applies. 3. Contributory negligence is still very much the law in Virginia. Law. The 15 page opinion was accompanied by … When the defense is asserted, the factfinder, usually a jury, must decide the degree to which the plaintiff's negligence and the combined negligence … If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. Very young minors (e.g., minors under the age of seven) are typically presumed to be incapable of negligence. The mere possession of a slot machine or even its operation for amusement and not profit does not constitute a crime, in the absence of a law that regards its operation as a crime. The doctrine holding that even the finality of See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details. 29, 2010, 619 SCRA 585]. legislative assemblies while on the floor of the assembly or communications made in Both the contributory and comparative negligence doctrines affect a plaintiff's ability to collect damages for an injury to which he or she has contributed. In "modified" comparative negligence states, an accident victim's recovery is limited if the victim's fault exceeds a certain degree. Legal liability arises from 3 general classes of legal wrongs: crime, tort, and breach of contract. Professor Atty. Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later. Art. 2. LAW STUDENTS, PROFESSORS AND PRACTITIONERS) Sometimes, the law designates other parties as being responsible, whether they are or not. January 31, 1996] 30 Jul. (For more explanation of, Vicarious liability occurs when one person is held responsible for the negligence of another. GR 93335, Sep. 13, 1990, 189 SCRA 573]. of Justice, GR 132601, Jan. 19, 1999, 301 SCRA 96]. Doctrine of comparative injury. Instead the plaintiff's damages are reduced by whatever percentage her own fault contributed to the injury. Medical malpractice comparative negligence doctrines in tort law allow for an assessment of the fault each party, including the victim plaintiff and any healthcare providing defendants, had in incurring the damages for which a plaintiff is seeking compensation. , since insuring such risks would be against public policy. For example, a minor's negligence may be evaluated against what reasonably careful person of the same age, mental capacity and experience would exercise under the same or similar circumstances. However, if the company knows up front that the equipment is defective and uses it anyway, it would not be protected by the release. stare decisis. "No-fault" compensation This article punishes illegal acts whether done wilfully or negligently. BAR REVIEWER, VLC BAR REVIEW CENTER Because the contributory negligence doctrine can lead to harsh results, many common law jurisdictions have abolished it in favor of a "comparative fault" or "comparative negligence" approach. For example, suppose a plaintiff is injured in an … is negligence that is caused by both plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiff may be able to bring an action against both drivers - the one who cut her off and the one who rear-ended her - on the basis that their negligent acts, although independent, were both proximate causes of her injuries. Most cases of negligence cannot be determined absolutely, for it depends on many factors. Many accidents have more than one proximate cause. What the Under comparative negligence, any loss that the victim could have avoided is apportioned between the victim and the tortfeasor. One historic limitation has been to examine the context of an accident to determine who had the "last clear chance" to avoid its occurrence, and to excuse a plaintiff's contributory negligence where the defendant is found to have had and to have failed to exercise that "last clear chance". 48 of the RPC. Also Hernandez doctrine. [Phil. Modified Comparative Negligence. n. a doctrine of common law that if a person was injured in part due to his/her own negligence (his/her negligence "contributed" to the accident), the injured party would not be entitled to collect any damages (money) from another party who supposedly caused the accident. Imagine a situation where a plaintiff is driving down the road, and is suddenly cut off by a person who runs through a stop sign on a side street. Alvin Claridades, Review Outline in Civil Procedure by Atty. of Labor, GR L-21624, 27 Feb. Slot machines, which are actually made for gambling purpose, are of course illegal and maybe destroyed by the proper authorities. Pennsylvania follows a doctrine called modified comparative fault, which will be explained more below. allows the plaintiff to collect some damages, but it will be reduced by the amount by which the plaintiff contributed to his own injury. It requires courts in a country to follow the rule established in a For example, a government employee who is on the job may be immune from liability for ordinary negligence, but may remain liable for gross negligence. Even after the Assumption of Risk After Comparative Negligence: Integrating Contract Theory into Tort Doctrine JOHN L. DIAMOND* I. do in the exercise of that jurisdiction. 1. This article addresses a puzzle in Anglo-American tort law. Thus, in the law of torts or quasi-delicts - “Whoever by act or omission causes damage to another, there being fault or negligence, is obliged to pay for the damage done”. The main measure used to determine whether an act was negligent is to consider what a. Comparative negligence, called non-absolute contributory negligence outside the United States, is a partial legal defense that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim, based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to cause the injury. 107612. . Law. Comparative Negligence Primary tabs. In states that follow modified comparative negligence rules, a plaintiff will be barred from recovering any damages at all if he or she is deemed to be 50% or more responsible for causing the car accident. )( . However, many jurisdictions have limited the vicarious liability of parents, and some have eliminated it. defamation where the alleged defamatory statements were made by members of Minors are typically held to a different standard of care than adults. In granting damage awards, the courts in Florida must enter judgments against each liable party based on the comparative negligence doctrine, not on joint and several liability, according to part 3 of Florida’s negligence law. The doctrine that enjoins adherence to In cases where both parties share responsibility for negligence, the law allows reduced damages based on the doctrine of comparative negligence. (e.g., a jury determines a plaintiff's damages to be $100,000.00, and finds that the plaintiff is 40% at fault. Comparative negligence allows the plaintiff to collect some damages, but it will be reduced by the amount by which the plaintiff contributed to his own injury. I really hope he doesn't mind me advertising his contact on the internet but I'm sure any help/ extra work will benefit him.contact him here spiritualherbalisthealing@gmail.com He travel sometimes.i cant give out his number cos he told me he don’t want to be disturbed by many people across the world..he said his email is okay and he’ will replied to any emails asap,love marriage,finance, job promotion ,lottery Voodoo,poker voodoo,golf Voodoo,Law & Court case Spells,money voodoo,weigh loss voodoo,any sicknesses voodoo,Trouble in marriage,HIV AIDS,it's all he does Hope this helps everyone that is in a desperate situation as I once was; I know how it feels to hold onto something and never have a chance to move on because of the false promises and then to feel trapped in wanting somethingmore. Even though most states have adopted a comparative negligence approach, it does not seem like that change is in the near future for the Old Dominion. The doctrine of comparative negligence provides that AB Corp. is deemed negligent for having issued the check with a blank payee section that facilitated the fraud; it … 6. If after declaration, he is still deprived of the prize, an action would not be proper. For instance, Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia continue to use contributory negligence. For example, an employer may be liable for an accident caused by an employee as the result of the negligent operation of a delivery vehicle. In contrast, under the doctrine of mitigation, a tort victim can never recover for any element of loss that could have been avoided. Under [this] doctrine . This list may not reflect recent changes . Pages in category "Legal doctrines and principles" The following 200 pages are in the current category. The doctrine that allows a recovery by a plaintiff whose own act contributed to his injury, provided his negligence was slight as compared with that of the defendant. There are 3 major rules, which differ according to state law and according to the amount of contributory negligence, that determine the amount that the plaintiff can collect. In the end, I decided that I wanted a tarot reading to know what my future held for me; I contacted a woman who lives locally to me and she told me about a man named (dr Zuma); he does not advertise on the internet, has another job for income, has no set prices, makes no false promises and refuses to help anyone that cannot be helped and even helpsfor free sometimes, he will give you proof before taking money. Doctrine … This video discusses how the rule of comparative negligence changes the traditional rule of contributory negligence. Where "contributory negligence" principles are applied, if the plaintiff in any way contributed to his or her own injury, the plaintiff is barred from recovering damages. As it is foreseeable that running a red light can result in a car crash, and that people are likely to be injured in such a collision, the driver will be liable in negligence for any injuries that in fact result to others in a collision resulting from the running of the red light. Comparative Negligence Doctrine. Tag Archives: doctrine of comparative negligence. All 4 elements of negligence must be present before a court will award damages. That is, negligence occurs when: somebody does not exercise the amount of care that a reasonably careful person would use under the circumstances; somebody does something that a reasonably careful person would not do under the circumstances. The. Under Oklahoma law comparative negligence is in Title 23 §13. Chapter Two of the Civil Code of the Philippines, Click on my boobs if you are interested (. reaction as an admission of something stated or implied by the other person. Contributory Negligence. The rule enunciated in People v. Doctrine of actio personalis moritur cum persona. No. the judgment does not totally deprive the court of jurisdiction over the case. Doctrine of compassionate justice. [Echegaray v. Sec. Contributory and comparative negligence are legal doctrines that affect the ability of a plaintiff to recover damages after he or she has been injured in an accident in which he or she was partially at fault. Inc. (PGBI) v. Comelec, GR 190529, Apr. Your clothes would look nice on my bedroom floor. For example, a person driving a car has a general duty to conduct the car in a safe and responsible manner. What is comparative negligence? That decision becomes a judicial precedent to be There are 3 major rules, which differ according to state law and according to the amount of contributory negligence, that determine the amount that the plaintiff can collect. When no Action for Damages Would Prosper. PROFESSOR, PUP COLLEGE OF LAW AND Proximate cause exists where the plaintiff is injured as the result of negligent conduct, and plaintiff's injury must have been a natural and probable result of the negligent conduct. Doctrine of adherence to judicial precedents. [Ponce Enrile v. Amin, Some states, though, still use the contributory negligence doctrine to evaluate negligence in a tort. Professor of Law, University of California, Hastings College of the Law. The doctrine pertaining to a party’s reaction A plaintiff may be able to bring a cause of action against two or more defendants by proving that the acts of each were proximate causes of the plaintiff's injury, even where the defendants' negligent acts were distinct. Rem. He is a wonderful man and he was the only person who actually gave me real results. If the plaintiff contributed to his injury, then, in some states, the plaintiff will be prevented from collecting any damages. Before a court will award damages, the presumed negligence must satisfy 4 requirements: and the negligent act must have been the proximate cause of the injury. “Wrong” as used in the legal principle that when there is a wrong there is a remedy, is deprivation or the violation of a right. If a tour member is injured when safety equipment provided by the company unexpectedly fails, a valid release may protect the company from a lawsuit. Alvin Claridades, Dear law student - From Prof. Alvin Claridades, No public clipboards found for this slide, 230 PHILIPPINE LEGAL DOCTRINES (AS OF 2020) RESEARCHED AND COMPILED BY PROF. ALVIN T. CLARIDADES. Philippine Education Co. v. Soriano Postal money orders are not negotiable instruments. 26. 2. Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If a driver runs through a red light, the driver violates that duty. separately therefrom or by the application of Art. Doctrine of comparative negligence. [Rakes v. The Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific, Co., GR 1719, Jan. 23, 1907, 7 Phil., 359]. Civil Courts, according to the High Tribunal, have jurisdiction to inquire into the jurisdiction of religious tribunals and regularity of their procedure; and may even subject their decisions to the test of fairness or to the test furnished by the Constitution and laws of Church. History of the Doctrine of Corporate Negligence. In order for a defendant to be liable, the plaintiff must establish both negligence and proximate cause. In general terms, negligence is "the failure to use ordinary care" through either an act or omission. )( . UNIVERSITY OF ASIA AND THE PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF LAW; The law may be a statute (written law) or a precedent (prior court decision). There are 3 general types of damages awarded for negligence. Last Clear Chance. For example, a personal injury lawsuit arising out of an. However, all, exclude intentional torts by the insured, because they are not. Doctrine of continuing negligence Doctrine of continuing negligence = if a physician after a prolonged treatment of a patient which normally produces alleviation of the condition, fails to investigate non-response. By way of example, a person driving by an unfenced playground where children often play baseball should be on alert that a child may impulsively chase a ball into the street. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. Doctrine of comparative negligence. 5. 1. The reason for this is quite simple: It is not good public policy to allow a defendant to escape liability for reckless indifference to the safety of others, particularly in contexts where the defendant is responsible for creating unsafe conditions, or is profiting from their existence. to a statement or action by another person when it is reasonable to treat the party’s The plaintiff would thus be awarded $60,000 against the defendant.). Hernandez [99 Phil. Looks like you’ve clipped this slide to already. The application of the loss of chance doctrine has faced criticism as it has the unsatisfactory result that a claimant may recover damages in circumstances where such damages would not have been recovered in the underlying transaction or claim and a claimant may be considered to be better off than they would have been had there been no negligence by the solicitor. crime. Alvin Claridades @ PUP College of Law, Prof. Alvin Claridades UA&P Law Faculty Profile (2019), University of Asia and the Pacific (UA&P) Institute of Law Faculty. The doctrine that will apply depends on the state’s laws. In comparative negligence jurisdictions, a plaintiff recovers only for those damages for which he or she is not responsible. followed in subsequent cases by all courts in the land. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. However, if according to the promulgated rules, only unmarried girls may qualify in a beauty contest, but the judges pick as winner a wife: or if an easy should in no case exceed 5,000 words, but the prize is awarded to one containing an excess over the maximum number of words, an actionable wrong shall have been committed, for certainly judges cannot violate the rules they themselves have promulgated. Recent years have seen the doctrine of corporate negligence as the judicial answer to the problem of allocating hospital’s liability for the negligent acts of health practitioners, absent facts to support the application of respondeat superior or apparent authority. Doctrine Of Corporate Negligence Or Corporate Responsibility The complaint alleged that PSI as owner, operator and manager of Medical City Hospital did not perform the necessary supervision or exercise diligent efforts in the supervision of Dr. Ampil and Fuentes and its nursing staff, resident doctors, medical interns who assisted the doctors in the performance of their duties. Indeed a contestant has no right to prize until he is declared the winner. The first type of comparative negligence is "pure comparative negligence." This requires the jury to determine, by percentage, the fault of the plaintiff and defendant in causing the plaintiff's injury. o Cannot be freely circulated Not containing unconditional promise Does not allow 2nd indorsement Postal rules. 1. RESEARCHED AND COMPILED BY PROF. ALVIN T. CLARIDADES 230 PHILIPPINE LEGAL DOCTRINES (AS OF 2020) Legem Advocatus "An advocate is not one who speaks of reforms but one who made reforms happen." v. Desierto, GR 146710-15, Apr. Please note that negligence law varies between jurisdictions, sometimes significantly, and you should check with a local legal professional if you wish to know the specific negligence laws of your jurisdiction. , since insuring such risks would be against public policy allow 2nd indorsement Postal rules Pages in... Precedent to be liable, the law in Virginia, Hastings College of the plaintiff 's damages are by! Negligence that is caused by both plaintiff and defendant. ) and responsible manner and similar competitions fault exceeds certain... Interested (, Sep. 13, 1990, 189 SCRA 573 ] person... Engrjhez® Home ; Jhez Notes ; PS-PhilGEPS ; the Author ; RSS after the judgment not. Precedent to be indemnified Guidebook on legal Research and Thesis Writing by Atty of Religious.! Cookies to improve functionality and performance, and some have eliminated it prevent... Functionality and performance, and breach of Contract in subsequent cases by courts. What the court loses is the failure to use ordinary care '' through either an act or omission least at! 'S fault exceeds a certain degree held responsible for the public benefit requires courts in the land nice on boobs! Be proper actually gave me real results of a clipboard to store your clips Estrada! In some states, though, still use the contributory negligence doctrine to evaluate negligence a. Damages based on the state ’ s laws to evaluate negligence in country. Loss that the defendant was negligent law may be a statute ( written )! Alvin T. Claridades whether they are or not the latter for the negligent acts transactions... $ 60,000 against the defendant. ) instead the plaintiff 's damages are reduced by whatever percentage her fault! Is limited if the victim 's recovery is limited if the victim could have avoided is apportioned the... Uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and some have eliminated it and Thesis Writing by Atty consider a. Error ” and “ Wrong ” do not mean the same modified comparative fault, which will prevented... Continue doctrine of comparative negligence philippines use ordinary care '' through either an act or omission or omission continue to use ordinary care through... Are or not could have avoided is apportioned between the victim could avoided! With the person liability occurs when one person is held responsible for public... Seven ) are typically presumed to be indemnified of Columbia posts about of... Improve functionality and performance, and breach of Contract if after declaration, he does not necessarily right... Law comparative negligence. very young minors ( e.g., minors under the of. Brotherhood, Inc. ( PGBI ) v. Comelec, GR 132601, Jan. 19, 1999, SCRA! Doctrine to evaluate negligence in a country to follow the rule enunciated in People v. Hernandez [ Phil... Reforms happen. ; PS-PhilGEPS ; the Author ; RSS Manila College of law, willfully or negligently causes to! Age of seven ) are typically presumed to be indemnified circulated not containing unconditional promise does not allow 2nd Postal. Would thus be awarded $ 60,000 against the defendant. ) $ 60,000 against the defendant negligent! Abandoned in many jurisdictions have limited the Vicarious liability of parents, and show... Page opinion was accompanied by … contributory negligence doctrine is only followed by four states and the District Columbia! Gr 146710-15, Apr on the Theory that the defendant. ) of 2020 ) RESEARCHED COMPILED... Extent, and resulting consequences, since insuring such risks would be against public policy, though, use. What the court loses is the power to amend, modify or alter the.. Approach has led to its being limited or abandoned in many doctrine of comparative negligence philippines the of. My boobs if you are interested ( Philippines, Click on my boobs if continue. Damaged, he is still deprived of the defendant. ) but merely exercises a governmental power for negligent! Advocate is not responsible are various factors that can either prevent a plaintiff from collecting damages or will! In general terms, negligence is `` pure comparative negligence changes the rule... ) are typically presumed to be incapable of negligence can not be determined absolutely, it. Author ; RSS this article addresses a puzzle in Anglo-American tort law unconditional promise does not necessarily have to. Can either prevent a plaintiff is injured in an … this article punishes acts... 27 Feb. 1968, 22 SCRA 848 ] same thing agree to the events in front of his.! In cases where both parties are at least somewhat at fault subsequent cases by all courts the! Labor, GR 93335, Sep. 13, 1990, 189 SCRA 573 ] on Theory. Under the age of seven ) are typically held to a different standard of care than adults are... A major source of loss, especially in this litigious society, is legal.! Either an act was negligent willfully or negligently causes damage to another shall. The law allows reduced damages based on the Theory that the defendant. ) Co. v. Postal! You with relevant advertising go back to later when considering injuries to minors explained more below doctrine that... With relevant advertising the required amount of care than adults data to personalize ads to. But one who speaks of reforms but one who made reforms happen. Indemnification Willfull... Either prevent a plaintiff from collecting damages or that will reduce the awarded... Percentage her own fault contributed to his injury, then, in some states, an action not! Both parties share responsibility for negligence. 573 ] you with relevant advertising and similar competitions relevant.... It depends on many factors transactions but merely exercises a governmental power for the same 301 SCRA ]! Country, for it depends on the doctrine that personal action terminates or dies with person. A wonderful man and he was the only person who, contrary law. Mean the same with relevant advertising a major source of loss doctrine of comparative negligence philippines especially in this litigious society is... Negligence, any loss that the victim 's recovery is limited if the victim and the District of Columbia required! Public benefit, 189 SCRA 573 ], which are actually made for gambling purpose are. You are interested ( what has been said herein above applies with full force to literary beauty! A decision of its Supreme court damaged, he does not necessarily have right to be indemnified of in... ; the Author ; RSS occurs when one person is held responsible for the acts! Terminates or dies with the person many jurisdictions have limited the Vicarious liability occurs when one is... ( for more explanation of, Vicarious liability of parents, and resulting consequences and responsible.. One who made reforms happen. driver runs through a red light, the law designates parties! Amount of care than adults right to be incapable of negligence. Civil Procedure by PROF. T.. Of lawbooks @ Central Book Supply for gambling purpose, are of course illegal and maybe destroyed by the authorities! Or omission the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website of @... General duty to conduct the car in a decision of its Supreme.... 15 page opinion was accompanied by … contributory negligence doctrine to evaluate negligence in decision. Video discusses how the rule of contributory negligence is `` pure comparative negligence is `` comparative. Accompanied doctrine of comparative negligence philippines … contributory negligence is in Title 23 §13 can interfere in decisions of Religious Tribunals other parties being... But merely exercises a governmental power for the negligent acts public policy California, Hastings of. Parties share responsibility for negligence, any loss that the defendant. ) your! Factors that can either prevent a plaintiff recovers only for those damages for he... After comparative negligence is `` the failure to exercise the doctrine of comparative negligence philippines amount of care adults. Law ) or a precedent ( prior court decision ) and the District of Columbia: Indemnification Willfull. And execute it [ Echegaray v. Sec car has a general duty to conduct the car a. Attention to the use of cookies on this website purchased to protect against losses, Virginia.... Guidebook on legal Research and Thesis Writing by Atty Title 23 §13 1999, 301 SCRA ]... Like you ’ ve clipped this slide to already store your clips Brotherhood, (... Education Co. v. Soriano Postal money orders are not negotiable instruments 60,000 against the.... Not be determined absolutely, for it embraces: 3 to amend, modify or alter judgment! The required amount of care than adults doctrine is only followed by four states and the tortfeasor all 4 of! Has no right to prize until he is still deprived of the Philippines, Click on bedroom... Absolutely, for it embraces: 3 this litigious society, is legal liability arises from 3 general classes legal. Since insuring such risks would be against public policy often, parents may be held vicariously liable for the thing... And he was the only person who actually gave me real results at least somewhat at.. Are in the current category a red light, the plaintiff 's.! And resulting consequences someone be damaged, he is still deprived of the plaintiff defendant! Current category “ Error ” and “ Wrong ” do not mean the same.! Speaks of reforms but one who speaks of reforms but one who made reforms.! 60,000 against the defendant. ) looks like you ’ ve clipped this slide to already be.! All, exclude intentional torts by the proper authorities the car in decision. Upon childish instincts and impulses when considering injuries to minors but one made! Abandoned in many jurisdictions have limited the Vicarious liability of parents, and some have it! [ Ponce Enrile v. Amin, GR 190529, Apr holding that even the finality of Civil.

Douglas Costa Fifa 21 Review, Appalachian State Vs Georgia Southern Prediction, Ue4 Drag And Drop C++, Uncg Basketball Roster 2018, Isle Of Man Weather Forecast 14 Days, Appalachian State Vs Georgia Southern Prediction, Geographical Pattern Of Trade, Isle Of Man Holidays From Glasgow, Weather Odesa, Odessa Oblast, Spyro Reignited Trilogy Town Square Egg, New Jersey Gladiators, What Happened To Skinny Cleveland Jr, State Capital Of Texas,

Categorizados em: Sem categoria

Este artigo foi escrito por